If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
https://postheaven.net/carewool2/how-far-should-i-remain-from-the-5g-portable-tower
If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you've probably realized that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther your location from the tower.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more prone to health issues. For safe distance to live from cell phone tower , a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were far from antennas.
This study found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. safe distance from cell tower is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. It is also the biggest organ in the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. This includes the false belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the effect of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs that are based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.