If you've ever wandered through a city you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could result in many possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis and skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further the tower is.
While this sounds like a good idea but the truth is that those living close to towers could be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who were away from the antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communications, may penetrate the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ in the human body, and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In what is a safe distance from a cell tower is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.