If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
They are replacing larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could cause problems for people.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
However, because what is a safe distance from a cell tower transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower could lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis and cataracts and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further you are from it.
While it sounds like something that's good, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more vulnerable to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas.
But, the study found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the most important organ in the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effects of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their limit of exposure to the local SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.